Not Another Facebook Post!

Over the past few years, Facebook has become the standard by which most of us lead our social lives. It informs us of what is going on, when and where it is happening, who is going and whether or not that one person that might be attending is available.

It is a system that is continually updated to try and make it as flawless as conceivably possible and along with it has influenced a whole host of new pop-culture references. You couldn't 'like' something ten years ago.



You couldn't tell people you'd just met to 'Facebook' you. You certainly couldn't have said "that's totally going in my status" without at least someone thinking you were crazy. But you can now!

However, there is one new addition to the Facebook-Phenomenon that, to me, is bordering on taking things too far. It's the new 'Places' feature for iPhones (and probably most other phones soon too), where people can tell you where they are and you can click on that location and be provided with a map of their exact whereabouts.

Now, call me old fashioned, but isn't this just asking for trouble? That crazy old fellow who makes an account as some young, dashing stallion is now able to follow your Facebook and find out exactly where you are, right down to the name and number of the street.

It's a feature that, in my opinion, is not really required- I guess it could be useful for police looking to lure dimwitted thieves into their clutches by posing as a money bag or something- but for the general population, what's wrong with someone saying "I'm getting food here" without the additional option of posting a detailed street map for all to see?



That said, I neither own an iPhone nor have the finances available to invest in one, so in reality, the presence of a Facebook 'Places' feature has little real effect on how I live my life. I guess I'm just trying to be a Good Samaritan and keep you all safe from the dark and evils of Internet Predators.

Which brings me to my next point… There is totally a Facebook-Posting button ON my blog! I'm not sure if people are negligent of this feature or they just don't find these posts interesting enough to recommend to their e-friends, but I *can assure you that there is much to be gained by pressing this button and posting it to your social profiles…



*Disclaimer: This cannot legally be assured by Nate-Radio or any related parties.

Caution: Educational Devices Ahead

In light of my recent string of examinations, I have decided that I should not be the only one forced to learn things for the (pointless) purpose of knowing them. If I learn something, I want it to be for practical value, yet somehow this is not the way modern tertiary education is set up.

Therefore, I present to you, Einstein's Theory of Relativity, or at least, the Nate Radio edition. Now for copyright reasons (be they real or imaginary) I must note that this metaphor is largely inspired by Brian Greene's informative book 'The Fabric of the Cosmos'. Legal mumbo jumbo aside, here's the set up:






Note: Now this part catches some people up. Remember, you're still going 100km/h, you're just not going 100km/h NORTH. That speed is now distributed both Northern and Western directions. The sharper than angle becomes (or the more West you go) the more your Northern speed will drop until you are going 100km/h West and 0km/h North (at which point, you'll by hoverboarding out of screen to the left).


Note: Remember- you're always moving through time. You're always going "North" until you are travelling light speed through space, which is interesting if you think about it… Since light moves through space at the maximum velocity, it does not travel through time (it is the equivalent in the first picture to travelling completely west).



So that's it! I hope it interested you slightly. I personally find it quite cool to think that light has no concept of time, that it is travelling completely through space and therefore never ages. Even more so, I hope that it made sense. If not, hit me up in the comments. I'll try to explain any discrepancies best I can (remember, I'm not a physics graduate, just someone who enjoys reading about a wide range of topics)

And if it did make sense- congratulations! You can go and brag to your friends about your superior knowledge of Einstein's theories and make them feel intellectually inferior to your glorious brain!

Final Note: It has been pointed out to me that km/ph is grammatically incorrect. I accept full responsibility for the error and hope it doesn't cause you grammar-nazi's to stress too much. I also acknowledge that it should, in fact, be typed km/h.

Important Message!!

Sometimes you need this.

Seeking Employment: Will Grow Moustache for Money

And once again, it is November. Christmas and New Years is just on the horizon, the end is in sight. It's the annual equivalent of the last 100 metre dash- the one that will determine whether you remain a stripy zebra or a bloody carcass for the vultures.

It's also Movember. A month devoted to hairy faced men and prostate cancer.

Why Prostate Cancer?

Here are some fun-facts.
• Each year in Australia, close to 3,300 men die of prostate cancer - equal to the number of women who die from breast cancer annually. Around 20,000 new cases are diagnosed in Australia every year.
• Each day about 32 men learn news that they have prostate cancer - tragically one man every three hours will lose his battle against this insidious disease
• One in 9 men in Australia will develop prostate cancer in their lifetime

So, I'm jumping on board and volunteering my [in]ability to grow a healthy patch of hair on my face in the name of making a pile of cash to go towards Prostate Cancer Research. I'm not one to beg for money online (or at least, not publicly) but this is for a very good cause.



If you're feeling charitable and you've got a moment to spare. Please visit my donation page here and pledge some money towards this cause, even if it's only one or two dollars. No donation is too small and it all goes towards a great cause.

Until then… Moustache AWAAAAAAAY!!!!!

Testing, Testing, 1, 2, 3

Today is a day of tests. I have my first exam tomorrow, for which I have studied very little and a completely open day to do whatever it is that I desire. The only problem is that there is an NBA doubleheader (with Chicago v New York followed by Portland v Oklahoma City) on television and then I'm due for a visit to the gym.

Is this my pre-exam? The one testing 'commitment' that is hidden under the clever guise of reality? Abraham Lincoln said: "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." I've got the power to have a solid day of cramming, yet I will probably spend more than half of it watching basketball. Somehow, I can't help but feel (slightly) dismayed at how easily distracted I am.



Silly NBA, testing me like this!

Maybe I'll just do both.

Compact Broadcast

Broadcast #1
I keep reading articles in the newspaper about people who are found dead on trains or in apartments after ridiculous amounts of time- I mean a mother AND daughter dead can go unnoticed for more than a month? What the hell? Have we become so self-involved as a society that we're beginning to miss corpses altogether?


Broadcast #2
Someone drove passed me the other day in a low, shiny, limegreen automobile. I don't know why but I had the Bells of Notre Dame from the Disney rendition of Hunchback of Notre Dame stuck in my head and somehow this popped into my head:

But then I remembered all the plastic surgery shows there are floating around and it killed my buzz.

Broadcast #3
The obvious similarities between the words 'chilli' and 'chilly' annoy me. Especially because the meaning of those words rest at such polar opposites.

When I invent a language, it will make much more sense.

Halloween Lives On!

For at least one more blost (that's NateSpeek for Blog Post, I'm hoping it catches on but I wouldn't stay I'm optimistic.)

I was in the shower this morning thinking of the tricking in 'Trick or Treat'. What happened to the tricking? It obviously hasn't been able to compete with the treating- as confirmed by Google (and this clever graph):


What is the deal? Are we becoming so lazy now that we'd prefer to give the kids candy than to teach them a cool new trick? When faced with the conundrum of teaching something or buying something, do we automatically just revert to the easy (if slightly more expensive) option?

I'm just as guilty as everyone else, last night, I gave the (three) Trick-Or-Treaters that came to my door chocolate bars- but no more! From now on, I say, lets learn some cool new tricks and NEXT Halloween, lets teach those kids something impressive.

Of course, I probably will forget to do this. In which case, I have a back up plan... And it goes a little something like this...